By Susann Wagenknecht
This publication investigates how collaborative medical perform yields medical wisdom. At a time while such a lot of today’s medical wisdom is created in study teams, the writer reconsiders the social personality of technological know-how to deal with the query of even if collaboratively created wisdom will be regarded as collective fulfillment, and if that is so, during which feel. Combining philosophical research with qualitative empirical inquiry, this booklet offers a comparative case research of mono- and interdisciplinary learn teams, providing perception into the daily perform of scientists. The booklet comprises box observations and interviews with scientists to give an empirically-grounded viewpoint on much-debated questions referring to study teams’ department of work, relatives of epistemic dependence and trust.
Read Online or Download A Social Epistemology of Research Groups PDF
Similar epistemology books
An up to date, transparent yet rigorous creation to the philosophy of technological know-how providing an necessary grounding within the philosophical figuring out of technology and its difficulties. The publication will pay complete heed to the ignored yet important conceptual matters resembling the character of clinical legislation, whereas balancing and linking this with an entire assurance of epistemological difficulties reminiscent of our wisdom of such legislation.
What makes the phrases we converse suggest what they do? Possible-worlds semantics articulates the view that the meanings of phrases give a contribution to choosing which attainable worlds could make a sentence real, and which might make it fake. within the first book-length exam from this standpoint, M. J. Cresswell argues that the nonsemantic proof on which semantic proof supervene are evidence concerning the causal interactions among the linguistic habit of audio system and the proof on the planet that they're talking approximately.
Lately there was a becoming acceptance mature research of clinical and technological task calls for an realizing of its spatial contexts. This booklet brings jointly members with assorted pursuits to check the spatial foundations of the sciences from a couple of complementary views.
- Human Knowledge and Human Nature: A New Introduction to an Ancient Debate
- Santayana, Edition: Rev Sub
- Causal Powers: Theory of Natural Necessity, Edition: 1st
- The Aim of Belief
- Franz Brentano's Analysis of Truth
Additional info for A Social Epistemology of Research Groups
74). Rolin’s distinction concerns the status of scientific knowledge: Should scientific knowledge, collaboratively produced by research groups, be analyzed as an irreducibly collective group view; or, rather, in terms of (testimonial) knowledge that can be attributed to single individuals? 2 Individualism or Collectivism? 25 This distinction is analytically important, and it reflects the debate that animates social epistemology’s ongoing interest in research group collaboration. What I suggest in this book, however, is a way to navigate past a rigid individualist/collectivist divide and add more nuance to Rolin’s distinction.
794), continuously adapting to the ways in which scientific fields evolve. Research group members, as Hackett observes, typically “work face-toface, sharing work space, materials, technologies, objectives, hypotheses 2 For competition among members of a research group see Edge and Mulkay (1976); Hagstrom (1974b), and for the complicated mediation between collaboration and competition in research groups see Traweek (1988, p. 88); Poulsen (2001). 1 The Phenomenon 23 and, to a significant degree, a professional reputation and fate” (Hackett, 2005, p.
My approach in Chap. 9 is different, since the philosophical concepts there are rather abstract, and particularly the concept of joint commitment has little traction with the forms of research collaboration I studied. Therefore, drawing on Melinda Fagan’s work (2011), I try to assess the applicability and the analytic value of these concepts in a more indirect way. In the remainder of this chapter, I describe how I access “concrete” scientific practice through a comparative case study, relying on ethnographic observation (Sect.